{"id":130779,"date":"2021-08-26T19:26:34","date_gmt":"2021-08-26T17:26:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/science-portal\/aesthetics-laboratory-of-the-faculty-of-humanities-and-social-sciences\/dija-logos\/"},"modified":"2026-09-25T15:49:14","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T13:49:14","slug":"dija-logos","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/science-portal\/aesthetics-laboratory-of-the-faculty-of-humanities-and-social-sciences\/dija-logos\/","title":{"rendered":"Dija-Logos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"padding-left: 10%; padding-right: 10%;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-6737\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/foucault_m-300x160.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"160\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/foucault_m-300x160.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/foucault_m.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>\u201cThe space in which we live, which draws us out of ourselves, in which the erosion of our lives, our time and our history takes place, the space that wears us down and consumes us, is itself heterogeneous. In other words, we do not live in some kind of void within which individuals and things may be located. We do not live inside a void coloured by various shades of light; we live within a set of relations that define sites which are irreducible to one another and absolutely cannot be superimposed upon one another.\u201d (M. Foucault)<\/p>\n<h2>EVENTS<\/h2>\n<h2>28 April 2026<br \/>\n<strong>Comrade Katarina in Conversation with EstLab<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1-300x164.jpeg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-118328\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1-300x164.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"423\" height=\"231\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1-300x164.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1-1024x560.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1-768x420.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/najava_kraj_kapitalizma_1.jpeg 1376w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 423px) 100vw, 423px\" \/><\/a>How and why is capitalism destructive? Is capitalism merely a particular socio-economic-political regime, or is it perhaps a \u201creligion\u201d (W. Benjamin)? And finally\u2026 when will we (and will we ever) witness the \u201c<em>end of capitalism<\/em>\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>These questions \u2013 along with many others \u2013 were raised during that afternoon in Room 54 at FFOS. Why? Naturally, because the guest of the cooperative known as EstLab was Katarina Peovi\u0107! This <em>remarkable woman<\/em>, a member of Radni\u010dka Fronta as well as the band FRONTA, and a professor of Cultural Studies in Rijeka\u2026 simply, <strong>Comrade Kate<\/strong>\u2026 spoke with philosophy students, visitors from Osijek, and the author of these lines.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Katarina_Peovic-300x225.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-118565\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Katarina_Peovic-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"426\" height=\"319\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Katarina_Peovic-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Katarina_Peovic-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Katarina_Peovic.jpg 1000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 426px) 100vw, 426px\" \/><\/a>Can material analysis be returned to the public sphere? Why should the proletariat establish itself as a nation? What is \u201cprotagonistic democracy\u201d? Through inspiring articulations, Katarina attempted \u2013 to the best of her ability \u2013 to respond to the numerous controversies of the world we inhabit. Furthermore, the conversation inevitably touched upon the neuralgic point of \u201cOur Beautiful Homeland\u201d\u2026 namely, the inability to articulate \u201cleft-wing thought\u201d in Croatia. No, our people are not stupid(?); rather, the structural necessity of the power of Capital makes it appear unavoidable. (However, one cannot excuse the <em>total lack of awareness and the political responsibility of political elites in the EU and Croatia regarding the condemnation of the genocide against Palestinians<\/em>, for example.)<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the questions of LABOUR and SOLIDARITY emerged as crucial. Let us become aware and finally \u201cawaken\u201d from this \u201cnightmare weighing on the brains of the living\u201d (Marx)! <strong><em>Una mattina mi son svegliato<\/em><\/strong>\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oZfuAUyCU90\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oZfuAUyCU90<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dMqiw4Ibo_s\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dMqiw4Ibo_s<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/oMg_SNDuc1o?si=G5mjnaWPapcosJ48\" rel=\"noopener\">EstLab \u2013 The End of Capitalism? \u2013 guest Katarina Peovi\u0107<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"mfoucault\"><\/a><\/h2>\n<h2 data-wahfont=\"24\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 24px;\">21 May 2024<br \/>\nEstLab Colloquium \u2013 The Right of Death and Power over Life<\/h2>\n<p data-wahfont=\"24\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 24px;\"><span class=\"yt-core-attributed-string yt-core-attributed-string--white-space-pre-wrap\" role=\"text\"><span class=\"yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1-300x169.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-87102\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"550\" height=\"309\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/estlab_foucault-1.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/a>As with everything else that remains even remotely meaningful today, the question of \u201clife and death\u201d remains a neuralgic one. This also applies to philosophy itself. What is the condition of its survival? Where lies the thin boundary of its continued existence\u2026 once again, its life and death? The philosopher who most persistently dealt with this question was certainly <strong>Michel FOUCAULT<\/strong>. The concluding text of the first volume of his planned six-volume work, provocatively entitled <strong>The History of Sexuality \u2013 The Will to Knowledge<\/strong> (1976), bears the title \u201c<strong>Right of Death and Power over Life<\/strong>\u201d. Here, Foucault exposes a permanent secret of modernity. It is the mystery of the relationship between knowledge and power. How is the contemporary capitalist world structured? The \u201carchaeology of knowledge\u201d develops into a distinctive \u201cgenealogy of power\u201d, while the administration of life becomes the fundamental means of subjugating individuals exposed to technologies of knowledge and strategies of power. Toward the end of his life, Foucault attempted to find \u201csalvation\u201d from this through the hermeneutics of the \u201ccare of the self\u201d (<em>epimeleia heautou<\/em>). After brutal sovereign power \u2013 most graphically and drastically described at the beginning of his book <em>Discipline and Punish<\/em> (1975) \u2013 the body is increasingly less subjected to cruel punishment and killing and increasingly\u2026 disciplined. It becomes the object of Capital\u2019s \u201ccare\u201d for a workforce that is healthy and compliant with the production process. Foucault also raises the entire subject to the level of the so-called history of sexuality. Power over life \u2013 at least since the 18th century \u2013 develops in two directions. The first is the so-called \u201canatomo-politics of the human body\u201d, which becomes a murderous death machine (or a war machine, as Gilles Deleuze and F\u00e9lix Guattari would later call it). The second is the \u201cbiopolitics of the population\u201d, regulating the hygiene of populations. And not only that\u2026 also \u201cat play\u201d here are demography, housing policy, health policy and epidemiology \u2013 the science of the \u201cproper shaping of the social body\u201d. The path from sovereign power \u2013 governed by the principle \u201cMake die and let live\u201d \u2013 through the disciplining of bodies within enclosed spaces \u2013 schools, factories, hospitals, barracks\u2026 and the prison itself \u2013 culminates in biopower as the driving force of contemporary capitalism. Its principle, therefore, is \u201cMake live and\u2026 let die\u201d. What does Foucault tell us about all this? What is the power of LIFE as RESISTANCE? And where can we find the \u201cstrength of resistance\/rebellion of life against the power seeking to control it\u201d? What place remains for LIFE within the all-encompassing biopolitics of today\u2019s war machine? Furthermore, how did the \u201csymbolics of blood\u201d transform into an \u201canalytics of sexuality\u201d, as the fundamental apparatus of surveillance over individual life within \u201cnetworked societies of control\u201d (Deleuze)? THE RIGHT TO LIFE\u2026 Can human beings still be what they are (Who They Are!) beyond all oppression and alienation? Is the \u201claw of the sword\u201d the fateful and unavoidable destiny of the individual, both in Foucault\u2019s time and today? Do we still possess any power to resist that \u2013 power? We attempted to answer these and other questions at the EstLab academic colloquium held on Tuesday, 21 May, from 6:30 p.m. at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek. Alongside EstLab members \u2013 <strong>Marijan Krivak, \u017deljko Senkovi\u0107, Daniel Horvat, Mislav Uzuni\u0107 and Boris Bosan\u010di\u0107<\/strong> \u2013 philosophy students from our Faculty also joined us at the event. mk<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab kolokvij - Pravo na smrt i mo\u0107 nad \u017eivotom\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/x_OkUX4bWl0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<h2><a name=\"postmarksizam\"><\/a><\/h2>\n<h2 data-wahfont=\"24\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 24px;\">16 April 2024<br \/>\nEstLab Forum: What Is the Post-Marxist Condition, or\u2026 What Is Theory For?<strong><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/postmarksizam.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-84304\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/postmarksizam.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/postmarksizam.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/postmarksizam-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/postmarksizam-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a>The Aesthetic Laboratory of FFOS (the well-known EstLab) marked three years of continuous activities and initiatives concerning books, film, music and\u2026 philosophy. And it did so, in its own spirit, in the best possible way! Its jubilee 50th event was held on Tuesday, 16 April 2024, in the nearly full Room 39 at FFOS. Our guest was the \u201c<strong>post-Marxist condition<\/strong>\u201d. Joining us from Zagreb were the author of the book of the same title \u2013 who was, incidentally, once \u201cour student in Osijek\u201d \u2013 Zvonimir Glava\u0161, as well as the renowned literary theorist and historian Tomislav Brlek. In conversation with the author of these lines, numerous topics related to literary theory and political theory were discussed, all within the context of a theme that has been present in the humanities for more than a quarter of a century \u2013 <strong><em>post-Marxism<\/em><\/strong><em><u>.<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n<p>First, the question arose as to what the so-called \u201ctheory\u201d (Why Theory?) means today, following the declaratively proclaimed \u201cend of philosophy\u201d. Theory \u2013 both in literary and political terms \u2013 responds to many neuralgic questions that keep the very \u201cmatter of thinking\u201d (Heidegger) alive. Following its initial \u201cappearance\u201d in the classic Laclau-Mouffe volume <em>Hegemony and Socialist Strategy<\/em> (1985), <strong>post-Marxism<\/strong> established itself as a cultural phenomenon through two books by Stuart Sim (1998\/2000).<\/p>\n<p>Tomislav Brlek explained many of the links between various \u201cpost-isms\u201d. Both <em>post<\/em>modernism and <em>post<\/em>structuralism are, in part, theoretical legacies invoked by nominal \u201cpost-Marxists\u201d. The author of <strong><em>The Post-Marxist Condition<\/em><\/strong>, Zvonimir Glava\u0161, explained his motivation for writing the book (which is itself the published version of his dissertation). Through the conversation among the three speakers, examples of some of the most important literary-political theories were brought into focus, especially those of the most significant French philosophers of the second half of the 20th century.<\/p>\n<p>The discussion addressed Jacques Ranci\u00e8re and his phrase \u201c<em>zoon politikon as a literary animal<\/em>\u201d; Deleuze and Guattari\u2019s famous book on <em>Kafka and minor literature<\/em> was also discussed, while the provocative work <em>Specters of Marx<\/em> (1993) by Derrida represented a kind of \u201ccrescendo\u201d of the entire debate. This book \u2013 somewhat heretical in relation to Marxist orthodoxy \u2013 interpretatively elevated the entire issue of \u201c<strong>post-Marxism<\/strong>\u201d to the highest achievements of so-called \u201cdeconstruction\u201d. Derrida\u2019s idea of <strong><em>justice<\/em><\/strong> as the only human category that cannot be deconstructed is deeply inspired by the spirit\/<em>spectre<\/em> of Marx\u2019s thought. As, incidentally, was the music of the band GANG OF FOUR, which framed the entire event in a <strong>danceable yet intelligent<\/strong> way! <strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"Estlab - Postmarksizam - gosti Tomislav Brlek i Zvonimir Glava\u0161\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/SrkiW8bH8uQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"entry-title\" data-wahfont=\"23\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 23px;\"><strong>6 June 2023<br \/>\n<\/strong><strong>Postscript on the <em>Societies of Control<\/em> by Gilles Deleuze<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"yt-core-attributed-string yt-core-attributed-string--white-space-pre-wrap\" role=\"text\">\u201cPerhaps one day, this century will be known as Deleuzian,\u201d Michel Foucault wrote in his <em>Theatrum Philosophicum<\/em>, to which Gilles Deleuze characteristically responded by saying that it was \u201ca joke meant to make people like us laugh and make everyone else turn pale\u201d. When we speak with Foucault and Deleuze today, we most often do so by identifying the transition from historical \u201cdisciplinary societies\u201d to the so-called \u201csociety of control\u201d. According to Deleuze, the general crisis affecting all enclosed environments \u2013 the prison, hospital, army, factory, school and family \u2013 produced a new historical constellation. What is the so-called \u201csociety of control\u201d (<em>la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de contr\u00f4le<\/em>)? It is something arising from the general reorientation from an analogue experience of reality toward the digital. It is also a consequence of the disappearance of social relations and the transition to the paradigm of so-called \u201ccommunication networks\u201d. For what constitutes the \u201cnew spirit of Capitalism\u201d? \u2026 A Kafkaesque Metamorphosis into the \u201cDemon of the Corporation as Network\u201d. According to Deleuze, the contemporaneity we inhabit can be described as an \u201centropic order of networked societies of control\u201d. Yet this is something \u00c9tienne de La Bo\u00e9tie, much earlier, would call\u2026 \u201cvoluntary servitude\u201d. \u201cMany young people strangely boast of being \u2018motivated\u2019; they ask for more training and permanent education.\u201d This is obvious to anyone who today attempts to revive some traditional forms of teaching <em>ex cathedra<\/em>. They encounter a \u201cwall\u201d of incomprehension, indeed, of \u201cdullness\u201d. Nevertheless, Deleuze\u2019s 1990 text, <em>Postscript on the Societies of Control<\/em> \u2013 which received the attention it deserved only after its English translation in 1992 \u2013 concludes on a different note. It concerns the evident \u201ctask of thinking\u201d with which the aforementioned \u201cyoung people\u201d might be confronted. Thus: \u201cIt is up to them to discover what they are being made to serve, just as their elders discovered, not without difficulty, the telos of discipline. The coils of a serpent are even more complex than the burrows of a mole.\u201d Moles, serpents\u2026 what is this about? We attempted to answer this and several other questions in a student seminar, assisted and moderated by EstLab members Bo\u0161ko Pe\u0161i\u0107, Adrian Bu\u010dek and Marijan Krivak, with a special guest appearance by Dario Vuger. mk<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab kolokvij - Post scriptum uz &quot;Dru\u0161tva kontrole&quot; Gillesa Deleuzea\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/T2Y_hby6GHE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><a name=\"hromadzic\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"entry-title\" data-wahfont=\"23\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 23px;\"><strong>18 April 2023<br \/>\n<\/strong>Our Everyday \u201cTransition\u201d \u2013 EstLab Conversation with Hajrudin Hromad\u017ei\u0107<\/h2>\n<p>YouTube recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/fD0XI6TM48Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/fD0XI6TM48Y<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/slika_hromadzic_web-300x160.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-59977\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/slika_hromadzic_web-300x160.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"470\" height=\"251\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/slika_hromadzic_web-300x160.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/slika_hromadzic_web-768x409.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/slika_hromadzic_web.jpg 996w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px\" \/><\/a>What is TRANSITION? Why does it still make sense to speak of this phenomenon belonging to the vocabulary of the \u201csemi-peripheral\u201d countries of \u201cour\u201d part of Europe and its civilisational culture? After all, WE here in Croatia have achieved major (magnificent!) accomplishments: accession to the European Union, membership in NATO, and finally entry into the euro area. Yet we still remain in a certain form of \u201ctransition\u201d. Why?<\/p>\n<p>These questions, along with many others, were addressed by the guest of the Aesthetic Laboratory at FFOS, Head of the Department of Cultural Studies at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Rijeka, <strong>Hajrudin Hromad\u017ei\u0107<\/strong>, at our relocated \u201cAgora\u201d, before numerous students and a handful of colleagues. Through the conversation between the author of these lines and the guest \u2013 conducted in a friendly, yet no less instructive and provocative atmosphere \u2013 many local \u201ctaboo topics\u201d were \u201copened\u201d. Following a short introduction to Hromad\u017ei\u0107\u2019s operative concept of \u201cculture\u201d, numerous concepts that tend to remain tacitly suppressed in this environment were addressed. All of them were published last year in the book entitled <em>LEKSIKON TRANZICIJE<\/em> (<em>Lexicon of Transition<\/em>) (Disput, Zagreb, 2022).<\/p>\n<p>The discussion began \u2013 thanks to a fortunate alphabetical coincidence! \u2013 with the concept of ANTIFASCISM. Indeed, the entire <em>Lexicon<\/em> is in a certain sense driven by an engagement with it. It immediately became apparent that what is considered part of a civilised order \u2013 a world founded upon modern Enlightenment achievements \u2013 is not necessarily something entirely plausible in the territories of the former Yugoslavia, including \u201cOur Beautiful Homeland\u201d. HH suggestively reactivated the legacy of <em>Antifascism<\/em>, as well as that of so-called TITOISM. The author revealed that, as part of his methodological decision, he placed these terms within the same conceptual framework as what is called the \u201cEnlightenment\u201d. And that is something still worth fighting for! Especially in the local environments of the former state, where historical revisionism prevails and where fascistic tendencies and relics of a dark past are latently encouraged \u2013 even by governing structures.<\/p>\n<p>In a somewhat \u201cmore relaxed\u201d atmosphere, terms closer to the spirit of our times were also discussed. These included INFLUENCER, SELFIE and EVENT, while particular humour accompanied the discussion of interesting ideological-media constructs such as UHLJEB. Finally, the very \u201cpeak\u201d of this \u201cevent\u201d (not an \u201c<em>Event<\/em>\u201d!) was the discussion of FOOTBALL as one of the foundational elements of the local hyper-emotional, almost religiously understood concept of \u2013 <strong>Statehood.<\/strong> \u201cFootball\u201d among Croats is much more than a game; it is a kind of sacred object of identification.<\/p>\n<p>The conversation between HH and the author of these lines was followed by numerous questions revealing great interest in the book <em>LEKSIKON TRANZICIJE<\/em>, as well as in the author\u2019s views. The subjects ranged from <em>religion<\/em> and <em>war veterans<\/em> to the ideological construct of the WEST! This was another in a series of intellectually engaged \u201cevents\u201d organised by EstLab. And we, the undersigned, remain convinced that this is the final line of defence protecting the <em>reliquiae reliquiarum<\/em> of the HUMANITIES, still present only in traces. <em>Dixi et salvavi animam meam<\/em>!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>mk<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Tranzicija na\u0161a svagda\u0161nja - gost prof. dr. sc. Hajrudin Hromad\u017ei\u0107\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/fD0XI6TM48Y?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a name=\"mikecin\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>19 January 2023<br \/>\n<\/strong>Thinking and Listening: <strong>H\u0113rakleitos \u2013 Parmenides \u2013 Plat\u014dn \u2013 Aristotle<\/strong> \u2013 guest Prof. Igor Mikecin, PhD<\/h2>\n<p>YouTube recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/p0X2khL5laA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/p0X2khL5laA<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-scaled.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-51911\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"360\" height=\"270\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/mikecin2-2048x1536.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px\" \/><\/a>In the Small Council Hall of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek, <strong>on Thursday, 19 January 2023, Prof. Igor Mikecin, PhD<\/strong>, from the Department of Philosophy at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb, delivered a guest lecture entitled <strong>Thinking and Listening: H\u0113rakleitos \u2013 Parmenides \u2013 Plat\u014dn \u2013 Aristotle<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Within the inherited philosophical doctrine of the senses, beginning with the Greeks \u2013 at the latest with Plat\u014dn and Aristotle, but already with Parmenides \u2013 thinking and seeing are distinguished as the two most valuable forms of sensory perception in comparison with all others. Among these, sight is assigned an exceptional role, primarily because of its contribution to the cognition of truth and its inner affinity with thinking. Indeed, thinking itself is defined by analogy with seeing as visual, contemplative (<em>theoria<\/em>) or beholding (<em>thea<\/em>) thought. At the same time, the sensible and the non-sensible, that is, sensory perception and non-sensory thinking, are opposed to one another and at times even separated. The non-sensible is defined as the only thing that is true, eternal, unchanging and always identical with itself, accessible solely to thought, while the sensible, as something always unequal and continuously changing, perceptible only through the senses, is subordinated to the non-sensible as its appearance. In such an opposition to thinking, sensory perception is therefore not true cognition, but deceptive and merely resembling truth. The analogy between seeing and thinking has consequences not only for understanding the nature of thought, but also for the distinctive givenness of what can be thought and what can be perceived by the senses, that is, for the interpretation of the being of beings in general. The fact that listening is subordinated to seeing reveals the forgetting of hearing in philosophy. Alongside the forgetting of hearing comes the forgetting of the dimension of listening within thinking. The forgetting of hearing further reveals itself as the forgetting of the essence of thought and of that which truly ought to be listened to and heard. The primacy of seeing over listening (videocentrism) is decisive for the entire history of philosophy from Plat\u014dn to Hegel. The dismantling of the dominance of vision is now an essential challenge for philosophy. Connected with this is the task of overcoming the separation between the sensible and the non-sensible, as well as between thinking and sensory perception. Behind the opposition between sensory perception and non-sensory thinking, listening must be uncovered as a privileged mode of perceptive attention (<em>noein<\/em>) and the fundamental character of gathering discernment (<em>legein<\/em>). This task can truly be undertaken only on the condition of historically recalling, first, the distinction between thought and sensory perception in Plat\u014dn and Aristotle, and second, the determination of discernment in H\u0113rakleitos and Parmenides, as well as the origin of this distinction. <em><strong>bp<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Mi\u0161ljenje i slu\u0161anje - gost prof. dr. sc. Igor Mikecin\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/p0X2khL5laA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><a name=\"milenkovic\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>13 December 2022<br \/>\n<\/strong><strong>EstLab Conversation: \u201cThe Necessity of Philosophy\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 guest Ivan Milenkovi\u0107<\/h2>\n<p>YouTube recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Ru15oQWygHY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/KxtQ3yoMGEE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>What is the \u201cnecessity of philosophy\u201d? And is philosophy still \u201cnecessary\u201d to anyone today? Finally, what could such necessity consist of when everything around us is \u201cprogrammed\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>The guest who rounded off this year\u2019s season of forums within the DIJA-LOGOS section of the Aesthetic Laboratory, appearing before students and other interested participants on Tuesday, 13 December, was \u2013 <strong><em>Ivan Milenkovi\u0107<\/em><\/strong>. Anyone even moderately informed about the \u201cmatter of thinking\u201d in this region needed no further introduction. A long-standing editor at the Third Programme of Radio Belgrade and an associate of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, he is one of those people who regard their <strong><em>vocation<\/em><\/strong> as a rare privilege, but also as a constant task of exposing all the anomalies of this planet, which we still rather unjustly (?) call the \u201cworld\u201d. Put simply, Ivan is an indispensable interlocutor in all matters concerning the remaining spaces of FREEDOM around us.<\/p>\n<p>How can the continued existence of philosophy be saved? Or, how can we still save our souls today? \u201cPeople\u2026 write!\u201d And again\u2026 \u201cwrite\u201d. Even when it appears that one is writing against the wind! (<em>S vetrom uz lice<\/em>, 1986, is one of the most important albums of the cult Belgrade band EKV.) Ivan Milenkovi\u0107 therefore devoted his introductory excursus to the necessity of thinking the whole. And that, in fact, is what philosophy IS! Even when it does so from such a provocative position as that embodied in the work of Gilles DELEUZE. Deleuze, Nietzsche, Machiavelli and, <em>last but not least<\/em>, Hannah Arendt were the principal subjects of the dialogue between Milenkovi\u0107 and Bo\u0161ko Pe\u0161i\u0107, professor of philosophy at FFOS. Through a lively and polemical dialogue, they also arrived at the observation that what is at work today is precisely the \u201cbanality of evil\u201d so masterfully described by Arendt. On the other hand, Deleuze\u2019s thinking of \u201ccontingency\u201d, as the accidental beginning of thought, emerges as necessary for every possible survival of what we call philosophy! Namely, the <strong><em>art of forming, inventing and fabricating concepts<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What makes a philosopher, according to our friend Ivan? A philosopher must never accept everyone around them simply \u201cpatting them on the back\u201d and approving of them. A philosopher must produce discomfort, resistance and intolerance around themselves through their provocative appearance(!?). When others around you feel uncomfortable in your company, then you are \u2013 genuinely \u2013 a PHILOSOPHER. Refusing to flatter anyone, such a person \u201cforces\u201d others to\u2026 <strong><em>think<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Ivan Milenkovi\u0107 certainly left no one in the audience indifferent. His commanding presence and the impressive thoughtfulness of the views he expressed were undoubtedly a \u201cprotreptic\u201d (Aristotle), an \u201c<strong><em>exhortation to philosophy<\/em><\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>EstLab sincerely thanks him, and not only for that! <strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Nu\u017enost filozofije - gost Ivan Milenkovi\u0107\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/KxtQ3yoMGEE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><a name=\"ivancic\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>6 December 2022<br \/>\n<\/strong><strong>EstLab Conversation: \u201c<\/strong>Croatian Political Aesthetics\u201d \u2013 guest Viktor Ivan\u010di\u0107<\/h2>\n<p>YouTube recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Ru15oQWygHY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/Ru15oQWygHY<\/a><\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, 6 December 2022, \u201cSt Nicholas\u201d brought the members and supporters of EstLab \u2013 as well as all those interested who may yet become supporters! \u2013 a visit from \u201cone of the three\u201d from <em>Feral<\/em> and their VIvaLUDE\u017d studio, Viktor Ivan\u010di\u0107. In conversation with this prominent figure of independent journalism, an entire series of elements revealing the distinctive nature of this distinctive journalistic discourse were uncovered. Yet this is not merely about \u201cjournalism\u201d, but also something even more important\u2026 namely, FREEDOM. It is connected with the very \u201cmatter of thinking\u201d advocated by the members of the Aesthetic Laboratory at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek since its foundation. Reading, writing\u2026 thinking and conversation, especially CRITICAL DISCOURSE, form part of an endeavour that introduces much more into the matter itself. Namely\u2026 the remaining meaningfulness of something such as philosophy and the humanities <em>an sich<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Viktor Ivan\u010di\u0107<\/em><\/strong> is an internationally awarded journalist, essayist, novelist, satirist of the reality around us, and columnist of the cult <em>Bilje\u017enica Robija K.<\/em> Above all, however, he is a persistent Lucifer (read: <em>light-bearer<\/em>) exposing every possible manifestation of the \u201ccosmic force of stupidity\u201d (Krle\u017ea, <em>On the Edge of Reason<\/em>), and not only among Croats. Having first emerged as young critics of socialist Yugoslavia, the members of <em>Feral<\/em> continued this mission, even more visibly in the media and through more detailed analysis, in the sovereign and democratic state of \u201cour Croatia\u201d. While in the SFRY they dealt with Party structures and the petrified \u201cunnatural\u201d system, in the successor states, following Rastko Mo\u010dnik\u2019s diagnosis, they point to the ominous \u201cnatural fascistogenic tendency\u201d. <em>Nota bene<\/em>, this is also a structural global problem. That Ivan\u010di\u0107 is also a philosophically conscious author is demonstrated by the title of his novel <em>Vita activa<\/em>. He also applies literary treatment as a mode of approaching the grotesque \u201cwildernesses of historical reality\u201d in his political study entitled <em>To\u010dka na U.<\/em> For us, however, he appears above all as an enlightener through the distinctive generic hybrid <em>Radnici i seljaci<\/em>, subtitled in a \u201cMontaignean\u201d manner \u2013 <em>Essays<\/em>. Recalling the almost forgotten history of the spaces we inhabit could serve as a pedagogical effort aimed at educating \u201ccritical consciousness\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The conversation unfolded in an extremely dynamic atmosphere. FFOS students were able to learn a great deal about journalism, a profession that Ivan\u010di\u0107 describes today \u2013 and not only in the country in which we live \u2013 as a \u201csubjugated profession\u201d. His presentation demonstrated that this need by no means be the case and that journalism can appear as a category of the PUBLIC GOOD. In this sense, FREEDOM and CRITICAL THINKING become indispensable, both in the media sphere and in preserving philosophy and the humanities <em>in themselves<\/em>. A lively and highly engaged discussion followed. Ivan\u010di\u0107 \u2013 himself a highly competent reader of philosophy, particularly Hannah Arendt, Agamben, Foucault and Sloterdijk \u2013 proved to be a stimulating interlocutor and a \u201clight-bearer\u201d of courageous and FREE expression concerning all the anomalies of the environment in which we live. <strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Hrvatska politi\u010dka estetika - gost Viktor Ivan\u010di\u0107\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Ru15oQWygHY?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a name=\"agamben\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>8 November 2022<br \/>\nEstLab Conversation: <\/strong>ON THE STATE OF EXCEPTION as a Mode of Governing the Contemporary World<\/h2>\n<p>YouTube recording of the event: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/gvZTr2EgmUA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/gvZTr2EgmUA<\/a><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/izvanredno-300x204.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-46153\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/izvanredno-300x204.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"420\" height=\"285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/izvanredno-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/izvanredno-768x522.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/izvanredno.jpg 777w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 420px) 100vw, 420px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>At the event held on Tuesday, 8 November 2022, as befits any philosophical discussion, the EstLab panel considered <strong>Agamben\u2019s<\/strong> thought in several distinctive ways, arriving at some thoroughly intriguing conclusions. The concept of the so-called \u201cstate of exception\u201d occupies a privileged place in <strong>Agamben\u2019s<\/strong> bibliography, and parallels between his perhaps best-known work, namely <em>Homo Sacer<\/em>, and this concept were drawn conscientiously and successfully, with the aim of presenting and thoroughly analysing its overall significance. If anything, what emerged were creative questions rather than monotonous and repeatedly rehearsed answers attempting to penetrate the refinement of <strong>Agamben\u2019s<\/strong> theory. What, in fact, is a state of exception, and why is it so exceptional? How does it arise and why? What conditions are indispensable for its application, and does it also exist within other socio-political frameworks \u2013 beyond the state and government? The discussion inevitably abounded in a wealth of perspectives, ranging from modern literature to examples from popular culture, while the insights produced through interaction with an animated audience only confirmed that this kind of academic discourse has its place in the mission of seeking truth and knowledge \u2013 perhaps even more than any other?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-45601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/agamben_najava-2-300x256.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"256\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/agamben_najava-2-300x256.png 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/agamben_najava-2-768x654.png 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/agamben_najava-2.png 979w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Agamben\u2019s key insight is precisely that states of exception form the foundation of our modern everyday life, manifesting themselves not only at the level of government, but also within other spheres of power: society, religion, even language and human reality in general. Following the same logic, although much earlier, Franz <strong>Kafka<\/strong>, in his <em>Metamorphosis<\/em>, used the term \u201c<strong>Ungeziefer<\/strong>\u201d to describe the creature into which Gregor Samsa had transformed, a term denoting a being of such lowly nature that, according to impure beliefs, it was not suitable for ritual sacrifice; something entirely negative, excluded, uncountable and resistant to classification. Is this not <em>Homo sacer<\/em> in its fundamental form? Is this not contemporary humanity in its (un)natural environment? Is this not the \u201cstate of exception\u201d in people\u2019s everyday lives? What matters, however, is that we do not despair when drawn into the entanglements of states of exception, but instead recognise exceptionality precisely within the so-called ordinary. Then we shall perceive new horizons through the cracks of everything old \u2013 in the impotence of authority and in the impossibility of tranquillity. Ultimately, we shall understand that everything is, after all, completely exceptional and strange. Unclear and extraordinary, as it must be\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong><em>ab<\/em><\/strong><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab -  Dija-logos - Izvanredno stanje kao vladanje suvremeno\u0161\u0107u (O Agambenu i nama)\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/gvZTr2EgmUA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a name=\"bercic\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>11 October 2022<br \/>\nEstLab Conversation: <\/strong>THE MEANING OF LIFE according to Boran Ber\u010di\u0107 \u2013 <em>philosophy as a possible answer?<\/em><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-43427\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"270\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1-300x135.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1-1024x461.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1-768x346.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_1-1536x691.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a>Room 39 at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek hosted the first \u201cevent\u201d of the new season of <strong>EstLab<\/strong> (the already well-known Aesthetic Laboratory of FFOS). The guest of the forum\/philosophical conversation was Prof. Boran Ber\u010di\u0107, PhD, Full Professor with tenure at the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Rijeka. The topic was more than intriguing! The title \u201cThe Meaning of Life according to Boran Ber\u010di\u0107. <em>Philosophy as a possible answer?<\/em>\u201d paraphrased the cult film from the 1980s, <em>Monty Python\u2019s The Meaning of Life<\/em>. The conversation immediately began with a direct question about what constitutes the most important philosophical question, at least for our invited guest in this conversation (or guided lecture, perhaps the most appropriate description of the event). Instead of the almost expected answer that it was the titular inquiry into the \u201cmeaning of life\u201d\u2026 we were told that it was, in fact, the relationship between FACTS AND VALUES. In this way, Ber\u010di\u0107 demonstrated his inclination toward the need, so important to analytical philosophers, to \u201cclarify things\u201d. The entire conversation offered a series of interesting and unusual arguments in favour of expressing everything that can be expressed <em>clearly and comprehensibly.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak-1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-43433\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"432\" height=\"324\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak.jpg 1672w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/bercic_krivak-1536x1152.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px\" \/><\/a>Boran Ber\u010di\u0107 served for many years as President of the <strong>Croatian Society for Analytic Philosophy<\/strong>. From this also follows the mode of his philosophical thinking. His major work, the two-volume book bearing the undisguisedly momentous(!) title <strong><em>Philosophy<\/em><\/strong> (2012), reveals this clearly. For an entire decade it has been a textbook that we openly admire, but, even more importantly, continuously question. In the book, Boran Ber\u010di\u0107 provides \u201ca comprehensive overview of the main themes and currents of philosophical thought\u201d. That is the \u201ctextbook description\u201d\u2026 Yet through conversation with Ber\u010di\u0107, many important questions concerning our everyday but equally decisive PROBLEMS posed by a \u201cphilosophy of life\u201d gradually crystallised. Ber\u010di\u0107\u2019s approach to philosophy is therefore not <em>historical<\/em>, but <strong><em>problem-oriented.<\/em><\/strong> In the introduction to <em>Philosophy<\/em>, the author states: \u201cIn order to know what we should do, <strong>we must know<\/strong> why we live?\u201d And further\u2026 \u201clogically speaking, in order to know why we do anything, <strong>we would have to know<\/strong> why we live at all\u2026 The question of the \u2018meaning of life\u2019 is the <strong>logical structure<\/strong> of our <strong>reasons<\/strong> for action.\u201d Through examining many such and related problems, \u201cthe meaning of life according to Boran Ber\u010di\u0107\u201d was gradually revealed. In brief, it could be expressed as \u2013 DOING PHILOSOPHY. Indeed, in a world in which work is not held in particularly high regard, such an effort of thought becomes all the more precious.<\/p>\n<p>The event attracted a large audience to the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Following the conversation between Ber\u010di\u0107 and M. Krivak (his former fellow student at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb during the \u201chappy 1980s\u201d), a discussion followed with numerous questions from the interested audience. And is there any other, more important purpose of philosophical conversation? <strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Smisao \u017eivota - gost prof. dr. sc. Boran Ber\u010di\u0107\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/5TrYxC3dSKc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 data-wahfont=\"18\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"text-align: center; font-size: 18px;\">EstLab Forum: What Does Krle\u017ea\u2019s \u201cEUROPE TODAY\u201d (1935\/2022) Tell Us?<\/h2>\n<p>On Tuesday, 24 May 2022, a forum organised by EstLab was held at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek. The title of the forum was <em>What Does Krle\u017ea\u2019s \u201cEUROPE TODAY\u201d (1933\/2022) Tell Us?<\/em> The occasion for the topic was Krle\u017ea\u2019s essay of the same name, first published in 1935, although its immediate relevance can easily be connected to the Europe in which we find ourselves today. This is particularly evident when considering Europe\u2019s \u201cstumbling\u201d through contemporary global political events. For example, one unavoidable question is: <strong><em>can the \u201cEuropean project\u201d today even be conceived independently of NATO\u2019s billions spent on armaments?<\/em><\/strong> Or, <strong><em>is there anything in Krle\u017ea\u2019s cynical-critical approach to the existing reality of Europe in his time that is not still relevant to the Europe we \u201clive\u201d TODAY?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Among those discussing these topics were philosopher and sociologist <strong>Ton\u010di Valenti\u0107<\/strong> from the Faculty of Textile Technology in Zagreb, together with professors from the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek: poet and theorist <strong>Goran Rem<\/strong>, theatre scholar <strong>Ivan Trojan<\/strong>, and philosopher <strong>Marijan Krivak<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - \u0160to nam govori Krle\u017eina &quot;Evropa danas&quot;?\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/alP9pPjVukg?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>Did Krle\u017ea prophetically anticipate our contemporary world? Is he truly, especially through his essays, novellas, dramatic works and novels, a \u201ccontemporary of Europe\u201d? Is Krle\u017ea significant on a global scale as well? Finally, and no less importantly, what was his relationship with Osijek, particularly in the context of his famous \u201cOsijek Lecture\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>As in Krle\u017ea\u2019s own work, many polemical tones prevailed. Likewise, the unquestioned \u201cdevotion\u201d of the media culture of spectacle to the actually existing image of Europe appears to be a manipulative illusion, just as it was in Krle\u017ea\u2019s time \u2013 and perhaps even more so today. Realistically, nobody today would be prepared to die on the barricades for the European Constitution! (Something still advocated, for example, by the living philosopher J\u00fcrgen Habermas.)<\/p>\n<p>In an interesting discussion before a well-filled university auditorium, numerous questions were raised and several answers offered. One of them was that Europe must follow its philosophical idea and foundation. Thus, as in Krle\u017ea\u2019s time, and even more so today, <u>Europe remains<\/u> our permanent destiny and\u2026 <u>task<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>mk<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 class=\"entry-title\" data-wahfont=\"23\" data-wahpro-titles-style=\"font-size: 23px;\">From the <em>Tractatus<\/em> to Language Games: \u201cThe Wittgenstein Case\u201d \u2013 guest Prof. Kristijan Krka\u010d, PhD<\/h2>\n<p>On Tuesday, 15 March 2022, EstLab (the Aesthetic Laboratory of FFOS) organised a forum entitled <strong>\u201cFrom the <em>Tractatus<\/em> to <em>Language Games<\/em>: \u2018The Wittgenstein Case\u2019\u201d<\/strong>. The invited guest was <strong>Kristijan Krka\u010d<\/strong>, Prof. PhD at the Zagreb School of Economics and Management (Z\u0160EM). He was joined in conversation by <strong>Boris Bosan\u010di\u0107<\/strong> and <strong>Marijan Krivak<\/strong>, professors at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek.<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Od Traktata do jezi\u010dnih igara - Slu\u010daj Wittgenstein - gost prof.  dr.  sc.  Kristijan Krka\u010d\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/TiX2XVhEmek?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>The occasion for the conversation was the centenary of the bilingual German\/English edition of <em>Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus<\/em> (1922). At the time, this book completely transformed the \u201cmental map\u201d on which the so-called \u201chistory of philosophy\u201d was drawn. Krka\u010d \u2013 certainly one of the most diligent and persistent scholars of the life and work of Ludwig Wittgenstein in this region \u2013 introduced the discussion provocatively. Namely, he argued that Wittgenstein had, in fact, been an \u201caccidental philosopher\u201d(!?). In a sense, his engagement with this \u201cdiscipline\u201d of the humanities was the result of numerous upheavals in his life through which this \u201cmodern Leonardo\u201d sailed across the turbulent sea of his many intellectual and natural-scientific interests. Wittgenstein was an engineer, an aeronautical designer, an innovator in mechanical engineering\u2026 he was a painter, an architect, a passionate lover of music, a capable pianist\u2026 and, <em>last but not least<\/em>, a philosopher!<\/p>\n<p>A lively discussion developed around Wittgenstein\u2019s philosophy, particularly the second phase represented by his <em>Philosophical Investigations<\/em>. What is LANGUAGE for Wittgenstein? To what extent does his understanding of language differ from the way it was defined\/detected by W. Benjamin and M. Heidegger, the most important \u201cphilosophers of language\u201d of the 20th century? Can we speak in his work of a prophecy concerning the arrival of \u201cartificial\u201d and \u201cmachine\u201d forms and languages of communication? To what extent is Wittgenstein \u201cresponsible\u201d for the loss of the \u201chuman dimension\u201d of language? Was he in some sense one of the founders of the so-called \u201cphilosophy of science\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>These and similar questions gave rise to a highly provocative and inspiring discussion. During the debate \u2013 which lasted almost two hours! \u2013 numerous problematic areas concerning the concept of language, but also philosophy in general, came to the surface. The forum on Wittgenstein prompted a multitude of questions and comments and demonstrated that the lecturer and guest, Prof. Krka\u010d, succeeded in generating great interest among FFOS students and professors. Ultimately, this was <strong>one of the best-attended events organised by EstLab<\/strong> during its first year of activity.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>mk<br \/>\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 699.75px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>A Conversation on the Occasion \u2013 Lino Veljak: Challenges of Our Time (20 January 2022)<\/h2>\n<p>On Thursday, 20 January 2022, we hosted <strong>Prof. Lino Veljak, PhD<\/strong>, on the occasion of the publication of his book <strong>Challenges of Our Time<\/strong>. The event was organised within the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/science-portal\/aesthetics-laboratory-of-the-faculty-of-humanities-and-social-sciences\/dija-logos\/\"><strong>Dija-Logos<\/strong><\/a> section of the Aesthetic Laboratory. The conversation was moderated by <strong>Assoc. Prof. Bo\u0161ko Pe\u0161i\u0107, PhD<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - Izazovi na\u0161ega vremena \u2013 u razgovoru s Linom Veljakom - 20. sije\u010dnja 2022.\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/nEA0u71atxU?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><strong>Lino Veljak<\/strong> was born in Rijeka in 1950. He graduated (1973), received his master\u2019s degree (1976: <em>Philosophical Foundations of the Theory of Reflection<\/em>) and earned his doctorate (1982: <em>The Philosophy of Praxis of Antonio Gramsci<\/em>) at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb. From 1974 to 1976, he taught philosophy and logic at the Second Grammar School in Zagreb. In 1976, he became an assistant at the Institute of Philosophy of the University of Zagreb (from 1978, the Department of the History of Philosophy at the Centre for Historical Sciences), where in 1978 he attained the research position of scientific assistant. From 1979, he worked in the same position at the Chair of Theoretical Philosophy of the Department of Philosophy at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb. He was appointed Assistant Professor in 1983, Associate Professor in 1990 and Full Professor in 2002. From 1992, he served as Head of the Chair of Ontology. He temporarily served as Head of the Department in 1982\/83. From 1992 to 1994 and again from 2006 to 2010, he served as Head of the Department, after which he became Deputy Head. From 2005 to 2020, he was also Head of the postgraduate doctoral programme in philosophy at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb. During the 1990\/91 academic year, he was a Humboldt Fellow at the University of Frankfurt. He has been a guest at numerous universities in Croatia and abroad. He has headed several research projects, is a member of various editorial boards and advisory boards of philosophical journals, and has served several terms as a member of the Executive Board of the Croatian Philosophical Society, serving as its president from 2009 to 2011. He served several terms as a member of the Scientific Field Committee for Philosophy and Theology and was its president from 2017 to 2020.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"0\" width=\"70%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"#B62126\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Round Table <strong>The Sociality of Art \u2013 The Art of Sociality (16 November 2021)<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-14540 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/tjedan_filozofije-300x194.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"194\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/tjedan_filozofije-300x194.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/tjedan_filozofije.jpg 628w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>The second event organised by the <strong>Dija-Logos section of EstLab<\/strong>, in the form of a Round Table, was held <strong>on Tuesday, 16 November 2021<\/strong>, as part of Philosophy Week and co-organised with the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Osijek. The topic of the round table was <strong>The Sociality of Art \u2013 The Art of Sociality<\/strong>. The participants were sculptor <em>Assoc. Prof. Art.<\/em> <strong>Tihomir Matijevi\u0107<\/strong>, literary critic <em>PhD<\/em> <strong>Igor Gajin<\/strong>, poet <em>Prof. PhD<\/em> <strong>Goran Rem<\/strong>, and philosopher <em>Prof. PhD<\/em> <strong>Marijan Krivak<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"dogadjanje1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr bgcolor=\"lightgrey\">\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>100 Years of Capitalism as Religion (12 October 2021)<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-16593\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Walter_Benjamin-248x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"248\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Walter_Benjamin-248x300.jpg 248w, https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Walter_Benjamin.jpg 330w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 248px) 100vw, 248px\" \/>The first event of the <strong>Dija-Logos<\/strong> section of <strong>EstLab<\/strong>, entitled <strong>\u201c100 Years of Capitalism as Religion\u201d<\/strong>, was held <strong>on Tuesday, 12 October 2021.<\/strong> The event was moderated by <strong>Marijan Krivak<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>What is this \u201ceveryday capitalism\u201d of ours? What are the premises of the doctrine \u2013 although, in fact, it is not a doctrine at all! \u2013 that teaches us the \u201cLord\u2019s Prayer\u201d of eternal acquisition and prestige measurable only through the insane game of profit figures that mean\u2026 What exactly do they mean?<\/p>\n<p>Precisely and simply \u2013 nothing!<\/p>\n<p>In capitalism, everything is rational except\u2026 Capital itself. This insight by Fredric Jameson \u2013 often quoted by Slavoj \u017di\u017eek \u2013 reveals the ontological structure of the \u201cthing itself\u201d (<em><strong>\u03c4\u1f78 \u1f44\u03bd<\/strong><\/em>), which is\u2026 nothingness!<\/p>\n<p>Walter BENJAMIN\u2019s fragment from 1921 explicitly deals with \u201cCapitalism as Religion\u201d. What is religion today? What is its <em>credo<\/em>? To act and make others believe. Believe in what? In the endless cycle of the constantly repeated scheme: Commodity \u2013 Money \u2013 Capital. Today, however, this has transformed into a <em>circulus vitiosus<\/em>: Information \u2013 Communication \u2013 Network. For\u2026 we are all entangled in the corporate networks of neoliberal capitalism as a \u201cstrategy of managing the world as a market\u201d (\u017d. Pai\u0107).<\/p>\n<p>What do we believe in? Pardon \u2013 what are we taught that we should believe in? What are these \u201cpsychotechnologies for controlling our desire\u201d? We believe in the ETERNAL CHRISTMAS OF CAPITAL! The greatest economic achievements of \u201cOur Beautiful Homeland\u201d \u2013 up until 2019 and the arrival of the COVID-19 agent, and then again up to the \u201cmagnificent tourist summer of 2021\u201d \u2013 were linked to\u2026 Advent. It is the \u201cCOMING\u201d of the \u201cbad infinity\u201d (Hegel) and the corruption of the meaninglessness of Capital, as the sole subject-substance of the contemporary world. A graffiti in Toronto in 2020 read: <strong>Corona is the Virus, Capitalism is the Pandemic<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Exactly 100 years ago, W. Benjamin wrote his fragment \u201cCapitalism as Religion\u201d. At the EstLab philosophical session, we discuss the lasting relevance of this insightful proposition. How is it possible for a \u201ccult without (any) dogma\u201d (Benjamin) to so completely occupy our souls and minds? The text announces a moment of complete abolition of our greed and insatiability.<\/p>\n<p>Through conversation, we challenge all our prejudices and opinions about capitalism. And what could thought today address more urgently and necessarily, if not precisely this?<\/p>\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe title=\"EstLab - 100 godina kapitalizma kao religije - 12. listopada 2021.\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Zp1V38z8sWQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe space in which we live, which draws us out of ourselves, in which the erosion of our lives, our time and our history takes place, the space that wears us down and consumes us, is itself heterogeneous. In other words, we do not live in some kind of void within which individuals and things [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":8719,"parent":125486,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-130779","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/130779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130779"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/130779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130812,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/130779\/revisions\/130812"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/125486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ffos.unios.hr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}